Cyclists have long known about the importance of rolling resistance in selecting tyres for racing, group rides or even general training. A high rolling resistance will require more power to travel at the same speed, whilst low rolling resistance requires less power.
We have performed tests on a large number of different inner tubes to see how they affected rolling resistance. Construction varied from plastic (Tubolito - S Tubo & Road), latex (Challenge, Vittoria, Michelin) as well as butyl (Continental, Schwalbe, Michelin, Hutchinson)
We used a Continental GP 5000 clincher tyre in 25mm to perform the test, and you can see how the GP 5000 clincher performs here: GP 5000 DATA
The goal of this test was to evaluate the rolling resistance performance of different types of inner tubes.
Having previously tested a variety of tyres, it's also important to make sure your inner tube choice is also correct as this also affects your rolling resistance. In this test we kept with one model of clincher tyre - the Continental GP 5000 in 25mm.
Michelin Aircomp latex
Continental Race Supersonic
Continental Race light
Tubolito S Tubo
Weight 22g (disc brake only)
The Tubolito S Tubo (disc brake only) inner tube was by far the lightest on test, weighing just 22g, which is 33g less than a Continental Race Supersonic inner tube, and 82g less than the heaviest tube (a Continental Race 28). 82g saved per wheel over a Continental Race tube gives a wheelset saving of 164g, which irrespective of rolling resistance will be a little faster - for a flat course 164g will be a minimal to no real saving, but if travelling uphill at 16kph on a 10% gradient, a 164g weight saving would equate to 0.8w saved, or a speed increase of 0.03kph. However - rolling resistance has much more of an impact than weight, read on to see the difference in rolling resistance.
ROLLING RESISTANCE RESULTS
In order to test rolling resistance, we used the same tyres and swapped between them as a rider rode a bike on rollers, measuring power output and speed, as well as atmospheric conditions and bike/rider weight. This allows us to calculate what is known as the Coefficient of Rolling Resistance (or "Crr"), which can be used to model the power output required to travel on a normal road. A lower Crr is better - in that it requires less power to travel at the same speed.
The Vittoria latex tube and the Challenge latex tubes were the fastest, saving over 7w for a pair of wheels compared with a standard butyl Continental Race inner tube.
All latex tubes were faster than other tubes (Butyl & Tubolito).
An extremely light Continental Race Supersonic was heavier than a Tubolito S Tubo / Road tube, but faster overall as the rolling resistance was less. The difference between a Continental Supersonic / Continental Race was 4w for a pair of wheels.
At 45kph, the difference between the fastest and slowest inner tubes would equate to around 12sec over 16km/10 miles.
In this updated test we found that there was a large difference in rolling resistance between different models of inner tubes, with standard butyl tubes being the heaviest and the slowest on test.
Latex inner tubes outweigh any small penalty from ultra light tubes like Tubolitos or a Continental Race Supersonic as the rolling resistance with a latex tube is so much lower (better). One small drawback with latex tubes is that they lose air overnight and require pumping up before a ride - so if you want to have an inner tube that's a little bit faster than a standard butyl tube and doesn't require daily inflation, Tubolito or Continental Race Supersonic would be two alternatives.