Road bike aero bottle testing

PH587141 • 17 July 2026

WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF USING ROUND OR AERO BOTTLES ON A ROAD BIKE?

 

Modern road bikes are designed to accommodate water bottles aerodynamically, knowing that riders will have a bottle on their bike most of the time, and especially in longer pro races such as the Tour de France.


This test explored the impact of putting a road bottle on an aerodynamic road frame (a Cannondale SystemSix), as well as an aerodynamic water bottle (Trek RSL), and multiple bottles of both varieties. This impact will vary depending on different bikes/frames and even front wheels, however this test is designed as a guide to help understand what could be occurring with your aerodynamics when you use a bottle on your bike.


The goal of this test was to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of different water bottle types and their locations on a road frame.


We used an aerodynamic frame (Cannondale SystemSix) for the test rather than a lightweight, non aerodynamic frame.

The bottles we used for this test were a standard 650ml round bottle, along with the Trek RSL Aero bottle, which has a stated 500ml capacity.


These were tested on both the downtube and seat tube of the bike. When testing downtube only we set the bottle as low as possible, but when testing downtube and seat tube in combination the downtube bottle was set in a higher location.


The top of the Trek bottle at the join with the cap is 50mm wide, with the widest point around halfway down the bottle at 61.5mm. The round bottle has a diameter of 74mm. The width of the downtube of the Cannondale is 48mm, and the width of the seat tube is 29mm.

We collected data for this test both in a wind tunnel at a wide range of yaw angles, as well as at a velodrome, to provide us with a combined data set.


In the velodrome we used the Track Aero System which gives real time CdA (aerodynamic drag) values as a rider cycles, and is the same system we use for our velodrome aero testing sessions. It enables us to collect large quantities of data with high accuracy and precision.


Our test rider was Xavier, who is 186cm tall and rides a 56cm Cannondale SystemSix. The front wheel was a Roval CLX Sprint fitted with a 28mm GP 5000 TT tyre in 28mm.

The wattage differences below are given at 45kph speed. For slower speeds, for example 35kph, the wattage differences will be around half what is shown.


Trek RSL Aero bottle


Using a single Trek RSL Aero bottle in the lower position on the downtube was very similar/slightly faster to having no bottle at all (0.1w difference which is within the error of the measurement). In their aerodynamic white papers, Trek have previously stated that their RSL Aero bottles can speed up frames compared with no bottles at all.


2x Trek RSL Aero bottles


Having two bottles in this scenario was slower, however. At 45kph there was a 4.8w penalty compared with no bottles at all/one single Trek bottle.


1x Round bottle


Mounting a 650ml round bottle on the downtube in the lower position was a 3.4w penalty over no bottle/1x Trek bottle.


2x Round bottles


Mounting 2x round bottles on the downtube and seat tube was the slowest configuration in the test, with a larger 9.5w penalty over one round bottle on the downtube only, and in total 12.9w over no bottles/one single Trek bottle.

With modern aero frames, consideration is taken to minimise the impact of water bottles, in particular on the downtube. 


The Cannondale SystemSix is aero focused, and has a wider downtube of 48mm to account for a bottle. The top of the Trek bottle is quite similar to this measurement at 50mm wide, and then gets slightly wider than the downtube further down (~11.5mm wider). The round bottle in comparison is 26mm wider than the downtube for its entire length.


Having a longer, slimmer bottle is more aerodynamic in this instance, when paired with an aero frame to match. There was a large penalty in both circumstances when a second bottle was added, however, and so this should be considered when looking at hydration strategies for shorter races where two bottles might not be necessary. We didn't test the impact of having no bottle and leaving the cage on in this test, which will have to wait for another time!

21 January 2026
Dr Xavier Disley explains UCI time trial bike position rules and regulations from 2026 onwards. The video shows how a bike is placed into a UCI jig and measured.
by PH587141 4 August 2025
It has often been said that to have good cycling wheel performance, there is a "rule" that the external rim width of a wheel should be at least 105% of the width of the tyre, or that there is a simple relationship/formula that will predict the aerodynamic performance of a wheel based on rim width vs tyre width. Whilst this may have rung true with older models of wheels which shared a V shaped or flat sidewall shape, modern rims come in a range of shapes which vary in terms of their aero performance due to a number of factors, not just external rim width. Rim depth, the vertical location of maximum rim width, nose profile (at the spoke entry point), dropoff angle to nose profile and "brake track" angle are all critical components that add up to allow for a fast rim shape. The data below is a subset, taken from a wind tunnel test of deeper time trial/triathlon wheels, both with normal spokes and composite multispokes (3 and 4 spokes), exploring if there is a simple relationship between the external width of a wheel and its performance, all with the identical same tyre.
by PH587141 30 July 2025
Reducing rolling resistance is imperative to improved cycling performance, particularly during high speed track cycling. A tyre with a high rolling resistance will require more power to travel at the same speed, whilst a low rolling resistance tyre requires less power. We have previous shown that top end clincher tyres, such as the FMB/AeroCoach Pista Ultra 3000 have extremely low rolling resistance. We have also found that for road tyres at road pressures, latex inner tubes are the best option for reducing Crr compared with TPU tubes. In this test we explore the difference between TPU and latex tubes but at higher, track relevant pressures and with a track specific tyre rather than a road tyre.
4 April 2025
AeroCoach has collaborated with French artisan tyre makes FMB to create the highest performance track clincher and tubular tyres. Read on for the process and data.
by PH587141 27 November 2024
The new Continental Aero 111 tyre is designed to provide maximal aerodynamic advantage by use of a custom tread pattern. However there is often a tradeoff between aerodynamics and rolling resistance (Crr) in terms of how tyres are shaped and how this affects Crr, and understanding how the two combine to provide the overall fastest system is essential when looking to improve performance on the bike.
16 February 2024
This test explores the difference in rolling resistance between clincher and tubular track racing tyres. Vittoria, Veloflex, Dugast and Continental tyres are compared at different inflation pressures.
Dr Xavier Disley of AeroCoach & Chris Hall are performing a road bike fit at AeroCoach HQ
by PH587141 23 October 2023
Chris Hall came to visit us at AeroCoach HQ in order to improve his bike fit on his Cervélo road bike, specifically focusing on aerodynamics for road bike time trials. Holding different positions such as in the drops, the breakaway aero position and on the hoods we explored the impact on Chris' body position and how that would relate to his aerodynamic drag. Watch the video to improve your road bike fit for aerodynamics: Xavier and Chris discuss narrow handlebars, turned in levers, torso angle, aero helmets and more!
22 May 2023
Ensuring you have the best equipment during high speed track cycling events is extremely important. This data set provides information on the best tubular track tires/tyres for rolling resistance/Crr.
6 July 2022
Aerobar extensions, whether used on a triathlon/TT bike or using a clip on system on a road bike, come in a wide variety of sizes and shapes. AeroCoach has been testing riders since 2012 and we've noticed a few trends into how you can optimally hold your extensions for aerodynamics as well as comfort. Your body accounts for around 80% of the aerodynamic drag of the bike and rider system. Your optimal stack height, extension reach and elbow width for aerodynamics will be individual and can only be determined by conducting an aero test, but as well as these variables there are differences in how riders hold their hands on extensions, and in this test we explored some general guidelines which you can follow. Don't forget, a lower aerodynamic drag will result in less power required to travel at the same speed, or for the same power will cause an increase in riding speed, when not travelling up steep gradients.
23 December 2021
In the UK, having a front light when racing time trials is now obligatory under CTT regulations. Not only this, but also some events are conducted over long periods of time (eg. 24hrs, or multi day ultra endurance rides) and so with front lights being a necessity we explored the impact of front lights on racing aeroydnamics in the wind tunnel.
Show More