Front rotor wind tunnel aero testing 140 vs 160mm

PH587141 • 10 September 2026

IS YOUR FRONT DISC BRAKE ROTOR SLOWING YOU DOWN?

 

Hopefully! But in this test we wanted to see whether there was any different between a 140mm front rotor vs a 160mm front rotor, of various makes and designs, on a full bike setup at race speed (45kph). We also made two rotor aero covers for a 140mm rotor, a flat cover and a lenticular cover to see if there was any aero benefit to completely covering the rotor.


The goal of this test was to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of different disc brake rotors in both 140mm and 160mm, as well as two aero rotor cover options.


We used a Cervelo P5 disc brake as the base model for the test, along with an AEOX Bolt front trispoke.

The rotors we used for this test were from Shimano, SRAM and TRP:


Shimano CL900 140mm 

Shimano MT900 140mm 

Shimano RT800 140mm 

Shimano CL700 160mm 


SRAM Paceline X 140mm 

SRAM CLX 160mm 


TRP 25 160mm 


The rotor covers were made in two types to fit the CL900 140mm rotor, a 1.8mm thick version ("Flat"), and a convex version which tapered down to the face of the rotor ("Lenticular").


The disc brake caliper was a Dura Ace, which was adjusted to fit each rotor size.

We collected data for this test in a wind tunnel at a wide range of yaw angles (from -15deg to +15deg).


We used a Cervelo P5 disc frame, with an AEOX Bolt front trispoke, and the test was conducted bike only with spinning wheels (no rider).

The wattage differences below are given at 45kph speed. 


140mm 

Shimano CL900 147.5w

Shimano MT900 147.6w

SRAM Paceline X 147.6w

Shimano RT800 147.7w

Average 147.6w


160mm

Shimano CL700 147.8w

SRAM CLX 148.0w

TRP 25 147.9w

Average 147.9w


140mm CL900 with covers

No cover 147.5w

Flat aero cover 147.6w

Lenticular aero cover 147.7w


In this test we found that all of the 160mm rotors had a higher/worse aerodynamic drag than any of the 140mm rotors. However this difference is very small and getting close to the margin of error for the wind tunnel when testing bike only setups.


At lower yaw angles approaching zero, there is less of a difference between the rotors, which makes sense as the frontal area differences are very small. At higher yaw angles the shape and design of the rotor will come into play which is why we can see more of a divergence in the aerodynamic performance between rotors.


When testing rotor covers, it is possible that allowing the air to flow in between the rotor is important, which may be why the RT800 rotor is less aerodynamic than the CL900 (the RT800 rotor itself is more filled in than the CL900). When the CL900 was covered the aerodynamic drag did not decrease, so we wouldn't recommend the use of rotor covers for aerodynamic purposes.

by PH587141 17 July 2026
Aerodynamic testing in a wind tunnel and velodrome for the difference between using an aero bottle and a normal round bottle on a road bike
21 January 2026
Dr Xavier Disley explains UCI time trial bike position rules and regulations from 2026 onwards. The video shows how a bike is placed into a UCI jig and measured.
by PH587141 4 August 2025
It has often been said that to have good cycling wheel performance, there is a "rule" that the external rim width of a wheel should be at least 105% of the width of the tyre, or that there is a simple relationship/formula that will predict the aerodynamic performance of a wheel based on rim width vs tyre width. Whilst this may have rung true with older models of wheels which shared a V shaped or flat sidewall shape, modern rims come in a range of shapes which vary in terms of their aero performance due to a number of factors, not just external rim width. Rim depth, the vertical location of maximum rim width, nose profile (at the spoke entry point), dropoff angle to nose profile and "brake track" angle are all critical components that add up to allow for a fast rim shape. The data below is a subset, taken from a wind tunnel test of deeper time trial/triathlon wheels, both with normal spokes and composite multispokes (3 and 4 spokes), exploring if there is a simple relationship between the external width of a wheel and its performance, all with the identical same tyre.
by PH587141 30 July 2025
Reducing rolling resistance is imperative to improved cycling performance, particularly during high speed track cycling. A tyre with a high rolling resistance will require more power to travel at the same speed, whilst a low rolling resistance tyre requires less power. We have previous shown that top end clincher tyres, such as the FMB/AeroCoach Pista Ultra 3000 have extremely low rolling resistance. We have also found that for road tyres at road pressures, latex inner tubes are the best option for reducing Crr compared with TPU tubes. In this test we explore the difference between TPU and latex tubes but at higher, track relevant pressures and with a track specific tyre rather than a road tyre.
4 April 2025
AeroCoach has collaborated with French artisan tyre makes FMB to create the highest performance track clincher and tubular tyres. Read on for the process and data.
by PH587141 27 November 2024
The new Continental Aero 111 tyre is designed to provide maximal aerodynamic advantage by use of a custom tread pattern. However there is often a tradeoff between aerodynamics and rolling resistance (Crr) in terms of how tyres are shaped and how this affects Crr, and understanding how the two combine to provide the overall fastest system is essential when looking to improve performance on the bike.
16 February 2024
This test explores the difference in rolling resistance between clincher and tubular track racing tyres. Vittoria, Veloflex, Dugast and Continental tyres are compared at different inflation pressures.
Dr Xavier Disley of AeroCoach & Chris Hall are performing a road bike fit at AeroCoach HQ
by PH587141 23 October 2023
Chris Hall came to visit us at AeroCoach HQ in order to improve his bike fit on his Cervélo road bike, specifically focusing on aerodynamics for road bike time trials. Holding different positions such as in the drops, the breakaway aero position and on the hoods we explored the impact on Chris' body position and how that would relate to his aerodynamic drag. Watch the video to improve your road bike fit for aerodynamics: Xavier and Chris discuss narrow handlebars, turned in levers, torso angle, aero helmets and more!
22 May 2023
Ensuring you have the best equipment during high speed track cycling events is extremely important. This data set provides information on the best tubular track tires/tyres for rolling resistance/Crr.
6 July 2022
Aerobar extensions, whether used on a triathlon/TT bike or using a clip on system on a road bike, come in a wide variety of sizes and shapes. AeroCoach has been testing riders since 2012 and we've noticed a few trends into how you can optimally hold your extensions for aerodynamics as well as comfort. Your body accounts for around 80% of the aerodynamic drag of the bike and rider system. Your optimal stack height, extension reach and elbow width for aerodynamics will be individual and can only be determined by conducting an aero test, but as well as these variables there are differences in how riders hold their hands on extensions, and in this test we explored some general guidelines which you can follow. Don't forget, a lower aerodynamic drag will result in less power required to travel at the same speed, or for the same power will cause an increase in riding speed, when not travelling up steep gradients.
Show More